Key Themes in Amos
- Tom Creedy
- 5 Oct 2020
-
2150views

The judgment against the nations
1:1-2 Title and announcement of God’s judgment
1:3-8 Messages of judgment against Damascus and Philistia
1:9-15 Messages of judgment against Tyre, Edom and Ammon
2:1-5 Messages of judgment against Moab and Judah
2:6-16 Judgment on Israel
The judgment against Israel
3:1-15 Israel is meant to be God’s chosen people
4:1-13 Israel is unrepentant of her sins
5:1-17 Injustice is widespread within Israel
5:18-27 The day of the Lord will bring judgment
6:1-14 The inevitability of judgment
The visions of Amos
7:1-3 The vision of the plague of locusts
7:4-6 The vision of judgment by fire
7:7-9 The vision of the plumb-line
7:10-17 The judgment against Amaziah and his family
8:1-3 The vision of ripe fruit
8:4-6 Condemnation of social injustice
8:7-10 The decree of punishment
8:11-14 Spiritual hunger in Israel
9:1-6 The vision of God at the altar
9:7-10 A righteous remnant will survive the coming punishment
9:11-12 The promise of restoration of the house of David
9:13-15 The promise of prosperity and return from exile
Background and setting
Amos, a shepherd and a farmer of sycamore-figs (1:1; 7:14), found himself conscripted by God to be his prophet (7:15) to the northern kingdom of Israel (though Amos’ message extended to other nations, including Judah). He could not but speak, for God had spoken to him (3:7-8). He was convinced that not just the substance or ‘drift’ of his message, but the very words he used were more truly God’s own words.
Amos saw a society and a religion on its last legs, but nobody else did. The two kings mentioned – Uzziah of Judah and Jeroboam II of Israel (1:1) – enjoyed long reigns in the first half of the eighth century bc. This was a time of affluence, political strength and national stability and expansion that allowed Jeroboam (c. 793–753 bc) to restore the Solomonic boundaries of his kingdom for the one and only time since the death of Solomon (cf. 2Ki 14:23-29). With the control this afforded him over trade routes, wealth began to accumulate but mainly in the hands of commercial barons. In this setting, the warning shots of divine displeasure (4:6-11) went unnoticed, and Amos was initially alone in seeing that the social, religious and moral evidence was all pointing one way: this nation and religion were doomed.
Themes and relevance
Standards in Amos’ society had declined. Authority and the rule of law were despised (5:10, 12). National leadership, while revelling in the publicity and dignity of position (6:1) and quick to score debating-points (6:2), was not facing the real issues but instead was contributing to the complete breakdown of law and order (6:3). Standards of public morality were at a low ebb: Amos could speak of sexual indulgence (2:7), transgressions and sins (5:12) and manipulative commercial practices (8:5-6).
Affluence, exploitation and profit were the main motivators. The rich were affluent enough to have several houses apiece (3:15) and not to deny themselves any bodily satisfaction (4:1; 6:6). The women lived for excitement (4:1), the notable men lived for frivolity (6:1-6), while the poor and defenceless were shamelessly exploited (2:6-7; 5:10-12; 8:5) or simply ignored and left broken.
Religion at the time adored what was traditional but had shaken free from divine revelation. The religious centres were apparently packed (4:4; 5:5, 21-23; 8:3, 10), sacrifices were meticulously offered, the musical side of worship was keenly studied but religious observance had become a self-justifying enterprise. The shrines at Bethel and Gilgal were still in full operation (4:4; 5:5; 8:14) but, for Amos, they were self-pleasing activities (4:5) and abhorrent to God (5:21-23).
Amos’ message has four main emphases.
First, Amos insisted that privilege brings peril (3:2). The claim of the day was that privilege brings security. The people of Israel had been privileged to have direct dealings with God (2:9-11); they had been shown in the past that God was on their side due to his covenant relationship with their father Abraham. However, Amos shows us that the nearer to God the closer the scrutiny will be and the more certain the judgment. Far from their privilege saving them, more will be required from those to whom more has been given; the greater the light the greater the risk.
Secondly, Amos insisted that past history cannot take the place of present spiritual and moral commitment. God looks for up-to-date commitment to himself (5:6), to moral values (5:14-15) and to personal and social ethics (5:24).
Thirdly, Amos emphasises that religious profession and religious practice are invalid – to be more precise, repulsive to God and therefore not just useless but also dangerous – unless verified by clear evidences. Amos clarifies the evidence of true religion. True religion is about responding to grace and the law with a life of obedience and resting on grace for forgiveness. It is about the reverent hearing and receiving of God’s word. In relation to others, true religion appears as honesty, considerateness and unfailing concern for the needy. It was no surprise that the social and moral decline of the nation coincided with a decline in its spiritual life because social justice concerns were linked in to Israel’s covenant with God and Israel’s practice of their religion. Take true religion away and what remains does nothing more than invite the adverse judgment of God.
Finally, Amos emphasises God’s sovereignty in judgment and restoration, especially in 7:1–9:15. Of the book’s nineteen occurrences of the title ‘the Sovereign Lord’, eleven come in these last three chapters. Amos’ message requires him to underscore God’s sovereignty and absolute freedom to implement his own will. This will includes securing both judgment and salvation, the overthrow of God’s enemies and the safety of his people.
The state of Amos’ society provided him with grounds for his ministry and it also provides us with grounds for considering that he will have something to say to us today. The marks of Amos’ society are marks of our society also: some more, some less. None of them is true about everybody; each of them is true about somebody. Amos might well have been walking through any of our great cities.
This blog post was extracted from the notes in the Bible Speaks Today NIV Study Bible, which is available now. The themes are expanded upon, and the text thoroughly expounded, in the new Tyndale Old Testament Commentary on Joel and Amos, which is one of the IVP October 2020 Releases.





